CSW 56 was closed without an agreed conclusions on Fri., 15th of March  2012. Dissent was over reproductive rights and gender equality in  general.
Draft Resolution Reaffirming Israeli Occupation Major Obstacle
For Palestinian Women’s Advancement, Self-Reliance Requires Recorded Vote
The Commission on the  Status of Women today sent a strong message to ensure that gender  equality was woven tightly into a blanket of initiatives spanning armed  conflict to natural disaster assistance, as it approved seven draft  texts, one by recorded vote, to be sent to the Economic and Social  Council for adoption.
The 45-member Commission  had been scheduled to conclude its fifty-sixth session today, but due to  ongoing negotiations on what it calls its “agreed conclusions”, it  suspended its work.  The Commission Secretary announced that the  conclusion of the current session would occur at a short meeting once  that text — this year, on empowerment of rural women and their role in  poverty and hunger eradication, development and current challenges — was  finalized and prepared in all six official languages.
During its day-long  meeting, the Commission adopted the provisional agenda of its  fifty-seventh session (document E/CN.6/2012/L.9).  It also approved a  draft resolution on the “situation of and assistance to Palestinian  women” (document E/CN.6/2012/L.2), by a recorded vote of 29 in favour to  2 against (Israel, United States), with 10 abstentions (Belgium,  Colombia, Estonia, Germany, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Republic of  Korea, Spain, Sweden).
Deploring the dire  economic and social conditions of Palestinian women and girls in the   Occupied  Palestinian  Territory, including  East Jerusalem, the  Council, by that text, would reaffirm that the Israeli occupation  remained the major obstacle for Palestinian women with regard to their  advancement, self-reliance and integration in their society’s  development.
Speaking after the vote,    Israel’s representative said that while the situation of Palestinian  women “may not be ideal”, by adopting the resolution, the Commission was  sending a message that other women were “not as important”.  The United  States voted against the text, saying the diplomatic Quartet should be  the mediator in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and Italy’s  representative, speaking on behalf of the European Union, said he had  abstained from voting, explaining that country-specific issues should be  covered in the General Assembly.  
“If this is not the right  forum to address these issues, then where is?” asked the representative  of the Permanent Observer Mission of Palestine to the United Nations,  adding that many United Nations and human rights reports had already  shown that the Israeli occupation remained the obstacle to empowering  women.
Following lengthy informal  consultations, the Commission approved an orally revised version of a  draft resolution on women, the girl child and HIV and AIDS (L.7), which  had originally contained 43 operative paragraphs.  The revised version  eliminated all but two operative paragraphs, which would have the  Commission take note of the Secretary-General’s report and would request  that the Secretary-General submit a report to the Commission at its  fifty-eighth session.
By consensus, Commission  members approved a draft decision on female genital mutilation (L.1), by  which the Commission would recommend for approval by the Economic and  Social Council and then adoption by the General Assembly a text  recalling the Assembly’s relevant resolutions and the conclusions of the  Women’s Commission and noting the Secretary-General’s report on ending  the harmful practice and the recommendations contained therein.  Also by  the text, the Assembly would consider the issue at its sixty-seventh  session.
Condemning all violent  acts committed against the civilian population, in violation of  international humanitarian law, the Commission approved a draft  resolution on release of women and children taken hostage, including  those subsequently imprisoned, in armed conflicts (L.3).  The text would  also have the Commission urge States that are parties to armed conflict  to take all necessary measures to determine the identity, fate and  whereabouts of women and children taken hostage.
While unanimously  approving a draft resolution on eliminating maternal mortality and  morbidity through empowerment of women (L.5), the Commission heard some  delegates’ reservations.  Abortion-related issues concerned several  representatives, including those of  Malta,   Poland and of the  Permanent Observer Mission of the Holy See.
The   Russian Federation’s  representative said he was concerned that the term “harmful traditional  practices” could inadvertently include non-harmful practices.  In  response,   Mali’s representative said there were 16 harmful traditional  practices, including cutting, that affected 85 per cent of her  country’s population.  “This is a public health concern,” she said.   “These are our traditional practices that we would like to fight  against.”
Turning to a draft  resolution on gender equality and the empowerment of women in natural  disasters (L.4), the Commission would, by that text, urge Governments  and, where appropriate, United Nations entities and civil society to  design and implement gender-sensitive economic relief and recovery  projects, and to ensure women’s and men’s equal access to natural-hazard  early warning systems and promote disaster risk reduction planning.  
Another approved  resolution stressed the importance of recognizing the distinct and  crucial contribution of indigenous women and their knowledge, and their  vital roles in diverse local economies to poverty eradication, food  security and sustainable development (L.6). 
In other action, the Commission took note of a number of reports of the Secretary-General on rural women and related issues.
In closing, Commission Chair Marjon Kamara (Liberia) thanked all for their participation.
Making statements on the  texts adopted today were the representatives of Jordan, Iran, Japan,  Algeria (on behalf of the Group of 77 and China), Russian Federation,  Malta, Mauritania, Cuba, Mali, Poland, Australia, Chile, and Norway (on  behalf of itself, Iceland and New Zealand). 
The Commission on the Status of Women will reconvene to conclude its fifty-sixth session at a time and date to be announced.
 
 
The situation about the lack of agreed-upon conclusions is disgraceful. I was at CSW presentations and was shocked by the blatant attempts to subvert "reproductive health" by radical Catholic groups. Now the Catholic bloc (Holy See, Poland, Malta) is apparently interfering with the final conclusions. Why, oh, why is the Holy See treated like a state? Why is a Commission that is supposed to stand for the empowerment of women and for gender equality, as well as reproductive health, being hijacked by these people? What can be done about this in the future?
ReplyDelete